提高雅思写作水平可以循序渐进，先学习好的范文并加以模仿，灵活运用语言写出好的句子和好的结构安排，然后慢慢提高自己的写作水平，练出自己的写作风格。
Task1 Table
* no figure available
The table below shows the amount of waste production (inmillions of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period.
分析：
本题是我小作文课堂上讲过的类似题目，有两个带星号的数据是丢失的，听过课就是赚到哦。
The table compares the amounts of waste that were producedin six countries in three separte years 1980, 1990 and 2000.
In each of these years, the US produced more wastethan Ireland, Japan, Korea, Poland and Portugal combined. It is also noticeablethat Korea was the only country that managed to reduce its waste output by theyear 2000.
Between 1980 and 2000, waste production in the USrose from 131 to 192 million tonnes, and rising trends were also seen in Japan,Poland and Portugal. Japan’s waste output increased from 28 to 53 milliontonnes, while Poland and Portugal saw waste totals increase from 4 to 6.6 andfrom 2 to 5 million tonnes respectively.
The trends for Ireland and Korea were noticeablydifferent from those described above. In Ireland, waste production increasedmore than eightfold, from only 0.6 million tonnes in 1980 to 5 million tonnesin 2000. Korea, by contrast, cut its waste output by 12 million tonnes between1990 and 2000.
Task 2
|
题目类别 |
生活方式和社会观念 |
提问方式 |
A/D |
|
考试题目 |
|||
|
Shops should not be allowed to sell any food and drinks that has been scientifically proved to be bad for people’s health.To what extent do you agree or disagree |
分析：
本题是生活方式和社会观念大类中的食品类的话题。题目讨论的是同不同意商店禁止出售那些被科学证明的不利于人体健康的食物和饮料。生活中能想到的这类食物可以有腌制食品(pickled food)，也可以被称为处理过或加工过的食品(processed food)，还有罐头食品(canned food)和油炸食品(fried food),程度好的同学应该还能转基因食品(GM food/ genetically modified food)。因为题目的论断使用了绝对化语气(any)，因此论述不同意此观点会更加容易，当然若是同意此观点，有详细论证也是可以的。
范文为不同意题目观点
主要原因：
第一点：商店有权利销售任何合法商品，包括那些可能对人体有害的食物，商家没有必要为了顾客的个人选择而承担后果。
第二点：有些被公认的有害食物在民众中非常流行，禁止销售它们会让商家蒙受巨大的经济损失
word count：275
Asthe concern for health is growing, the food safety issues have triggered many debates in recent decades.Some people put an argument that shops are not permitted to sell any harmful food forward. I disagree with this opinion and will give supporting ideas from two (shop and food) aspects.
Toshops, it isa reasonable right that big stores can sell any legal commodities,including those foods which areharmful to people’s health.The act of purchasingand selling is a business activity, which is irrelevant to public health andbusiness responsibilities.Shops do not need to take the consequences for customs’personal choice since everybody is free to choose what they want to eat and drink.
Besides,some recognized bad foods are truly quite popular among the public; therefore,shops will lose considerable economic benefits if they stop selling these goods.Thesebad foods with low nutritional value like processed foods and canned drinks areusually taste good because the producers often add different kinds ofaddictives into these foods and drinks in order to enhance their flavours. Also,some processed foods are even regarded as traditional foodthat people will have almost every day, pickle is a telling example. In addition, because of the lowerprice, some food like genetically modified products are attractive to general public,despite the fact that they may undermine people’s health.
Inconclusion, it is unnecessary for shops to stop selling any harmful foods anddrinks, not only because they have right to choose foods and drinks to sell butalsobecause they will suffer huge financial loss from doing this.
